Nah, Super Mario 64, Super Mario Sunshine, and Super Mario Galaxy are all in the contest already, and I don't think the new game changes anything about them too dramatically.
Not to mention SM3DA is a poor and utterly lazy collection.
I would say it's a very good lazy collection.
The games themselves are good. The presentation and effort is bad.
Nintendo don't deserve credit for simply dumping three roms on a cart and running them in HD/16:9. They also don't deserve credit for charging $60 or releasing it for a limited run of 6 months, even digitally wtf.
Not to mention SM3DA is a poor and utterly lazy collection.
I would say it's a very good lazy collection.
The games themselves are good. The presentation and effort is bad.
Nintendo don't deserve credit for simply dumping three roms on a cart and running them in HD/16:9. They also don't deserve credit for charging $60 or releasing it for a limited run of 6 months, even digitally wtf.
I agree with all that, just to me a bad collection would be games that were not well optimized or didn't play well in the collection. These games all play and control great. I also like the presentation - the little graphics as a game loads, the classy font on the main menu.
It's just so barebones. No wide screen in 64 is a bummer, and no galaxy 2 is a bummer. Would have also been nice for them to adjust the way blue coins work in sunshine and other QOL stuff.
Currently reading: A Feast For Crows AND A Dance With Dragons
Wait, WTF? Why wasn't The Talos Principle already nominated? It must have been in one of the user-submitted subcategories last time.
• TONe's Discord server is a laid-back place to chill & chat
• Please subscribe to help my Langrisser channel on YouTube!
• Follow me on Twitch to get a notification when I'm streaming
